GOOD DEED? OR COMPLETE JERK-OFF?

I saw this story yesterday and cannot believe that this Ohio state trooper is actually going to get away with pleasuring himself in front of a kid. That's right! Apparently, it's okay in the state of Ohio to do things like this. 

So, apparently, an Ohio state trooper, Ricky Vitte, Jr., watched porn and masturbated with a young boy to teach him about sex will not be charged with any offense. In fact, his deed will go entirely unpunished and he'll be able to keep his cushy $83,000-a-year-job despite reportedly confessing to carrying out the self-love affair twice with the pre-teen five years ago. Vitte says that he even told his wife all about the seedy rendezvous because he saw it as a "good deed." He claims that he "did not want (the boy) to feel pressured on feeling the need to have to have sex with someone, when he can fix those needs by masturbating to porn." He also claims that there was a dresser blocking their view of each other as they pleasured themselves. Oh, then that's okay! No, it's not! 

I mean I can see where Vitte was coming from, but was this boy his son? Was it his place to teach the boy about masturbation? Isn't that the parents' job to teach their song about these types of things? The whole thing gives me the creeps. The county prosecutor even decided not to present Vitte's case to a grand jury because he said the trooper might have presented an explanation to justify his actions. Are these people nuts? The decision angered clinical counselor Marlene Boas, who asked whether it would have been the same outcome had the alleged victim been a girl. She went on to say that she "can't imagine a situation where that would be appropriate in our culture."

This is not the first time Vitte has been in trouble with the law either. Back in 2004, he was charged with domestic violence after spanking his then-girlfriend's 5-year-old son until his ass cheeks bled and then he turned around and head-butted his girlfriend for complaining. He's also in the middle of fighting a custody battle over his five children with his wife, who claims he punched holes in the walls and doors when he was angry. Sounds like someone has some anger issues, yet the state of Ohio wants to let this idiot keep his $83k-a-year job. I don't get it. He went from beating kids to beating himself in front of a kid. Not only should they wonder if he would've been prosecuted had this been a pre-teen girl; what if he wasn't a police officer? Would he be in trouble then? Something seems fishy here and I don't think that having a dresser in the way so that they didn't see each other should be the difference here. It wasn't his place to teach this kid about the birds and the bees! Why can't people see that? Am I the only one?