IT'S A DOGGY AFFAIR

     I never really understood the whole bestiality thing. I look at my dog definitely do not find him at all attractive. That being said; this is Jonathan Edward Medley from Geneva, Alabama. He is being accused of having sex with his wife's dog, Buster, because he felt she was paying more attention to the pet than him. Um, yeah...That's a tad bit disturbing!

     Medley was charged with animal cruelty after his wife caught him doing the deed with her 2-year-old shih tzu. Wait what? He had sex with a shih tzu? Those dogs are so small! What the hell is wrong with this guy? When I first read this story, I pictured Medley getting down with an American Bulldog or something. Not a shih tzu! He should be embarrassed. 

     Medley's wife made the disgusting discovery when she decided to spy on him because she thought he was sleeping with another woman. So she hid a recording device in the couple's apartment. Much to her surprise, he was molesting her dog. According to police, Medley was upset because his wife was paying more attention to the dog than him. I still don't get that. If that was the problem, why take it out on the dog? Just leave your wife or have a talk with her at the very least. Or, I'm sure I'll catch some flack for saying this, but he could have accidentally left the door open and the dog could have accidentally escaped from the house. There was no need to molest an innocent little shih tzu. 

     Buster, the shih tzu, suffered injuries from the alleged sex marathon with Medley and the police initially thought the injuries might have led to Buster's euthanization, but a veterinarian later said Buster was recovering just fine. Medley, who is 39, was held on $535 bail after his arrest Friday. He only faces a misdemeanor charge, as per Alabama's law on bestiality. That's a crock! Medley should be charged like a rapist! I'm sick of these states treating pets like a possession or an object. They are living beings and he violated one. A couple of years ago, a vet in Philadelphia killed my wife's beloved cat, Attila, by giving him a dog's dose of chemotherapy accidentally, where he died within two days. The vet did claim responsibility, but they took a life and all they could say was sorry. We contacted three lawyers about suing and they said it wasn't worth it because pets are considered property and we would only get what the cat was worth. It didn't make sense to have to pay for a lawyer only to get back $50 in court. Then again, we weren't suing for monetary reasons. My wife wanted to see the person who killed our cat suffer. Nothing ever happened because our family member is considered just property. Just like Buster, the shih tzu is considered just property. It makes me sick!